|
Demonstrates a level of knowledge and identification of the main ideas.
40 %
|
Key ideas were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
Key ideas were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
Key ideas were poorly identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
Key ideas were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
|
Non-compliant
|
|
Clear analysis with relevant supportive detail and examples of each subject of the question
30 %
|
Shows superior knowledge of the manager’s skills and working both individually and in teams with some examples.
|
Shows adequate knowledge of the manager’s skills and working individually and teams.
|
Shows some understanding of the skills and working in teams.
|
Shows little understanding of the skills of managers.
|
Non-compliant
|
|
Proper organization, professional writing, and logical flow of analysis.
10 %
|
- Paragraphs well organized
- Sections with logical organization of paragraphs (especially introduction, body and conclusions)
- Few grammatical errors
-Appropriate word selection
-Correct use of scientific terms
|
- Most paragraphs well organized
- Sections with logical organization of paragraphs (especially introduction, body and conclusions)
- Several grammatical errors, typos, and misspelling may be present
- Some misappropriate word usages errors (effect vs. affect)
- Some misuse of scientific term
|
- Many paragraphs well organized
-Several grammatical errors, typos, and misspelling may be present
|
- Paper lacks well organized paragraphs
- Sections do not contain information presented in a logical order
- Many grammatical errors
- Many misappropriate word usages errors (e.g., effect vs. affect)
- Many misuses of scientific terms
|
Non-compliant
|
|
Using APA formatting
20 %
|
- Correct APA format with no errors. Includes at least 5 relevant references (science articles, books, websites).
|
- Correct format and includes 4 relevant references.
|
- Some errors, at least 3 relevant references.
|
- Many errors, 2 references.
|
Non-compliant
|
