Produce a report that evaluates the effectiveness of the engineering processes (at least t

Produce a report that evaluates the effectiveness of the engineering processes (at least three) used to manufacture the productand how human factors affect the performance of the engineering processes.

BTEC Learner Assessment Submission and Declaration

When submitting evidence for assessment, each learner must sign a declaration confirming that the work is their own.

Learner Name& Group:

 

 

Assessor Name:

 

 

BTEC Programme Title:

BTEC L3 Foundation Diploma Engineering (2020-2021)

Unit or Component Number and Title:

Unit 2: Delivery of Engineering Processes Safely as a Team

Assignment Title:

A:Engineering processes and human factors (LO1) 

Date Assignment Submitted:

 

 


Please list the evidence submitted for each task. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found or describe the nature of the evidence (e.g. video, illustration).

Assignment task reference

Evidence submitted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Plagiarism is a particular form of cheating. Plagiarism must be avoided at all costs and students who break the rules, however innocently, may be penalised.  It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand correct referencing practices.  As a university level student, you are expected to use appropriate references throughout and keep carefully detailed notes of all your sources of materials for material you have used in your work, including any material downloaded from the Internet. Please consult the relevant unit lecturer or your course tutor if you need any further advice.  

Learner declaration

I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

 

 

Learner signature: __________________________________________Date:_____________________________

 

BTEC Assignment Brief

Qualification

Pearson BTEC Level 3 National Foundation Diploma in Engineering

Unit or Component number and title

Unit 2: Delivery of Engineering Processes Safely as a Team

Learning aim(s) (For NQF/RQF only)

A: Examine common engineering processes to create products or deliver services safely and effectively as a team.

Assignment title

Engineering processes and human factors

Assessor

 

Hand out date

 

Hand in deadline  

 

Vocational Scenario or Context

You are working as a final year apprentice in a small engineering company. You have been using some engineering processes to manufacture small components as part of your team; your manager is pleased with your work and has decided that you should be given some more responsibility. He wants you to look at whether the company is using the most appropriate engineering processes when manufacturing small components

Your manager has asked you to examine an assembly they could produceand to report back on the engineering processes that can be used to make it, including health and safety factors, and how human factors could affect the performance of these processes. The report will impact upon company investment decisions in the future.


 

 

 

Task 1

You are going to evaluate the effectiveness of engineering processes and how human factors affect them.
To do this:

Your tutor will provide you with an engineering drawing of an Engineer’s bevel gauge. Using a range of engineering manufacturing processes. You need to:

• Research the processes used (at least three) when manufacturing this, including relevant health and safety factors and legislation/regulations; and

• Research how these engineering manufacturing processes can be affected by human factors (individual and team).

You then need to:

Produce a report that evaluates the effectiveness of the engineering processes (at least three) used to manufacture the productand how human factors affect the performance of the engineering processes. Your report should include:

• Information on the advantages and limitations of the engineering processes used (at least three) compared with the advantages and limitations of using other possible processes, which should include justifications as to which processes are most effective, by referring to the specific requirements of the product – as part of this, you must provide thorough details about how the engineering processes work/operate, including health and safety factors and legislation and regulations that apply; and evidence that you have a strong awareness of a range of human factors, and can judge how they impact on the performance of the engineering processes from both an individual and team perspective.

Checklist of evidence required

A report, prepared as an individual, detailing engineering processes and the impact that human factors can have on their performance, using a case study context based on a given engineered product(s) or a given engineering service(s).

 

Criteria covered by this task:

Unit/Criteria reference

To achieve the criteria you must show that you are able to:

2/A.D1

Evaluate, using high quality written language, the effectiveness of using different engineering processes to manufacture a product or to deliver a service and how human factors, as an individual and a team, affect the performance of engineering processes.

 

2/A.M1

Analyse why three engineering processes are used to manufacture a product or to deliver a service and how human factors, as an individual and a team, affects the performance of engineering processes.

 

2/A.P2

Explain how human factors, as an individual or a team, affect the
performance of engineering processes.

 

2/A.P1

Explain how three engineering processes are used safely when
manufacturing a given product or when delivering a given service.

 

Sources of information to support you with this Assignment

Textbooks

Pearson textbook specific to new BTEC Nationals in Engineering

Schrader, G. et al. (2000) Manufacturing Processes and Materials, 4th Edition, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 0872635171.

Mikell P. Groover (2010) Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Son, Inc.

SeropeKalpakjian, Steven Schmid (2007) Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall

Websites

https://archive.org/stream/IntroductionToBasicManufacturingProcessAndWorkshopTechnology/Introduction%20to%20basic%20manufacturing%20process%20and%20workshop%20technology%20%281%29#pag e/n0/mode/2up

 

http://www.efunda.com/processes/processes_home/process.com

www.peo.on.ca/index.php/ci_id/19394/la_id/1.htm

 

 

Other assessment materials attached to this Assignment Brief

eg, work sheets, risk assessments, case study

     

 

ASSESSMENT RECORD SHEET

Programme Title

BTEC Extended/Foundation Diploma Engineering (2020-2021) 

Learner Registration Number

 

Learner Name

 

Assignment Title

A: Engineering processes and human factors

Assessor Name

 

Unit or ComponentNumberand Title

Unit 2: Delivery of Engineering Processes Safely as a Team

Targeted Learning Aims/Assessment Criteria

A

First Submission

Deadline

 

Date Submitted

 

 

Has an extension to the deadline been approved by the Assessor due to extenuating circumstances?

 

 

Targeted criteria

Criteria achieved

Assessment comments

2/A.D1

 

 

2/A.M1

 

 

2/A.P2

 

 

2/A.P1

 

 

General comments

 

Learner Declaration

I certify that the evidence submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

Learner signature

 

Date

 

Assessor declaration

I certify that to the best of my knowledge the evidence submitted for this assignment is the learner’s own. The learner has clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

Assessor signature

 

Date

 

Date of feedback to learner – this must be within a timely period of the assessment taking place

 

Resubmission authorisation

by Lead Internal Verifier*

 

Date

 

* All resubmissions must be authorised by the Lead Internal Verifier. Only one resubmission is possible per assignment, providing:

  • The learner has met initial deadlines set in the assignment, or has met an agreed deadline extension.
  • The tutor considers that the learner will be able to provide improved evidence without further guidance.
  • Evidence submitted for assessment has been authenticated and accompanied by a signed and dated declaration of authenticity by the learner.

**Any resubmission evidence must be submitted within 15 working days of learners receiving assessment feedbackwhich must be within a timely period of the assessment taking place.

 

Resubmission

Deadline

 

Date submitted

 

Targeted criteria

Criteria achieved

Assessment comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General comments

 

Learner Declaration

I certify that the evidence submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

Learner signature

 

Date

 

Assessor declaration

I certify that the evidence submitted for this assignment is the learner’s own. The learner has clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

Assessor signature

 

Date

 

 

Date of feedback to learner

 

 

ASSESSMENT RECORD SHEET

 

Programme Title

BTEC Foundation/Extended Diploma Engineering (2020-2021) 

Learner Name

 

 

 

Assignment Title

A: Engineering processes and human factors

Assessor Name

 

 

 

Unit or ComponentNumberand Title

Unit 2: Delivery of Engineering Processes Safely as a Team

Targeted Learning Aims/Assessment Criteria

A

 

 

Retake

 

 

Deadline

 

 

Date submitted

 

 

 

Targeted Pass criteria

Criteria achieved

 

Assessment comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General comments

 

 

 

 

 

Learner Declaration

I certify that the evidence submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

 

 

Learner signature

 

Date

 

 

 

Assessor declaration

I certify that to the best of my knowledge the evidence submitted for this assignment is the learner’s own. The learner has clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

 

 

Assessor signature

 

Date

 

 

 

Date of feedback to learner

 

 

INTERNAL VERIFICATION – ASSESSMENT DECISIONS

Programme title

BTEC Foundation/Extended Diploma Engineering

(2020-2021) 

Unit(s)

Unit 2: Delivery of Engineering Processes Safely as a Team

Assessor

 

Internal Verifier

 

Assignment title

A: Engineering processes and human factors

Name of Learner (If a larger sample is required please add rows or use additional sheets)

Submission Type

(First, Resubmission, Retake)

List which assessment and grading criteria the Assessor has awarded. Please state specific criteria and not an overall grade

Assessment Decision Accurate (Y/N)

List the assessment and grading criteria where inaccurate decisions have been made

State why the assessment decision is inaccurate.

*If an inaccurate decision is recorded the Internal Verifier must recommend actions detailing the issues to be addressed before assessment decisions are issued to learners. The Assessor and the Internal Verifier must then confirm that the action has been undertaken.

 

See Page 1

 

 

 

 

 

INTERNAL VERIFIER CHECKLIST

Y/N

Has every learner and the Assessor confirmed the authenticity of the evidence?

 

Is there evidence of collusion or plagiarism?

 

Does the assessment feedback to each learner:

  • Link to relevant assessment criteria
  • Justify each assessment criterion awarded
  • Provide appropriate guidance to the learner without giving specific actions for improvement

 

 

GENERAL COMMENTS (if appropriate)

 

 

 

Any actions required must be reviewed across the whole cohort.

Action Required

Target Date for Completion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been addressed and completed in respect of the whole cohort.

Internal Verifier signature

 

Date

 

Assessor signature

 

Date

 

Lead Internal Verifier signature (if appropriate)

 

Date

 

                               
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for د.إ50 Free

Formatting

for د.إ32 Free

Title page

for د.إ20 Free

Bibliography

for د.إ36 Free

Outline

for د.إ19 Free

Limitless Amendments

for د.إ38 Free

Get all these features for
د.إ195.00 FREE

ORDER NOW
assignment bank giveaways

Our Ratings