Deliver a personal perspective on relevant disruption and global engagement practice.

RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGMENT

Assessment 2

Disruption & Engagement

Due:                      Week 8

Weighting:             30%

Type:                     Case Study Review / Visual & Written Presentation)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. research, analyse and critically evaluate effective disruption practices;
  2. critically evaluate global cultural dynamics that impact disruption and engagement;
  3. write concise, coherent and informed arguments of how social, cultural, ethical, environmental and sustainability theory applies to digital media practise;
  4. deliver a personal perspective on relevant disruption and global engagement practice.

Description:

Research and analyse a case study of disruption with global implications that was unsuccessful in achieving its intended objective. Reflect and write a critical analysis to identify why the disruption was unsuccessful, the impact it did or did not make, including level of engagement, social, cultural, ethical, environmental & sustainability considerations with reference to theory (include citations using Harvard referencing). Describe how you would have approached it differently to deliver the desired outcome. In addition, prepare a self-reflective statement of the personal position on the project process and outcomes. Present as a visual presentation (min. 20 slides) and written presentation (2,000 words).

Details:

Students must cite at least 3 external sources and refer to these using Harvard referencing (in text citations and reference list). Also include a full bibliography.

Upload final essay as a PDF file (Word converted to PDF) and a second PDF file (PowerPoint converted to PDF) of the visual presentation to Moodle for marking.

Marking Criteria & Rubrics:

Criterion 1:

Depth of research and analysis – 40%

Fail:

Incomplete research and analysis

Pass:

Adequate but basic research and analysis

Credit:

Competent research and analysis

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed research and analysis

 

 

 

Criterion 2:

Critical evaluation of influences and impact – 20%

Fail:

Incomplete critical evaluation

Pass:

Adequate but basic critical evaluation

Credit:

Competent critical evaluation

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed critical evaluation

High Distinction

Outstanding critical evaluation

 

Criterion 3:

Personal refection – 20%

Fail:

Incomplete personal reflection

Pass:

Adequate but basic personal reflection

Credit:

Competent personal reflection

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed personal reflection

High Distinction

Outstanding and insightful personal reflection

 

Criterion 4:

Quality of presentation (incl. Referencing) – 20%

Fail:

Incomplete presentation, no references

Pass:

Adequate but basic presentation, some references

Credit:

Competent presentation with references

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed presentation, accurate references

High Distinction

Outstanding presentation, includes additional references

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for د.إ50 Free

Formatting

for د.إ32 Free

Title page

for د.إ20 Free

Bibliography

for د.إ36 Free

Outline

for د.إ19 Free

Limitless Amendments

for د.إ38 Free

Get all these features for
د.إ195.00 FREE

ORDER NOW
assignment bank giveaways

Our Ratings