Critically discuss the dilemmas inherent in integrating ethics and social responsibility into organisational strategy

  
🔴 LIVE EXPERT
  136 Orders

Module Title: Organisational Behaviour and Global Strategy 

Module Code: HR7002
Level: 7
Term: 2

HR7002 – Organisational Behaviour and Global Strategy

Assessment Guide
Submission Deadline:

 Term 2

ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Individual Portfolio (3,000 words) PLUS/MINUS 10%
1- Identify a multi-national organization. Investigate and critically analyse the strategy of the organization utilizing the range of strategy content including the nature of the organizational culture.
2- Identify a significant event, challenge, transformation or merger/acquisition that affected the organization. Please make sure you take into consideration the current pandemic and other contemporary drivers of change.
3- Analyse how the challenge was managed by the organization, with a focus on leadership, culture, and the human relations aspects of the context. Apply any theory, model of change or strategy as discussed in lecture and practiced in seminar and include the company’s ‘competitive advantage’ (John Kay, VRIO, etc).
4- Discuss how the organization’s strategy and/or change management impacted the management of the challenge. Furthermore, critically discuss the impact of the challenge on the organization’s strategy. Some examples you might like to explore: Did policy change? HR? Technology? Communications? Logistics?
5- Communicate effectively the strategic response of the organization to the    external change or impact and add at least three (3) of your own recommendations.

Additional information on the Assessment:
You are encouraged to search for potential organizations early and ensure that you have access to adequate data sources for completing your report, before you finalize your choice.
*Please note the list of forbidden companies. You must not choose any of the companies listed or you will have to redo and resubmit at a lower mark. Please see list in your Moodle under ‘Assessment Guide’.

This assessment will be graded using the following criteria:

  1. Critical analysis of the strategy of the organization, applying theories and conceptual frameworks covered in the module (30%)
  2. Critical application of leadership and management of change models/theories to analyze the context in question (30%)
  3. Discussion and synthesis of the strategy and change aspects of the selected challenge; evidence of wider reading critically applied in your analyses (30%)
  4. Presentation, structure, grammar and referencing (10%)

The following Learning Outcomes are demonstrated via this assessment Knowledge (The below is what learning outcomes are engaged, not the instructions, which are above).

  1. Critically discuss the dilemmas inherent in integrating ethics and social responsibility into organisational strategy
  2. Critically evaluate different models/theories and perspectives on the organization, leadership and the management of change
  3. Discuss the dilemmas or advantages inherent in strategy development and change management Thinking skills
  4. Appraise the strategic situation of a business’s internal environment. Subject-based practical skills
  5. Appraise strategic proposals and develop contextually appropriate alternatives Skills for life and work (general skills)
  6. Communicate effectively on strategy, leadership and change management to both expert and non-expert audiences

Assessment Criteria

GENERIC DESCRIPTORS

Command of the Subject

Subject Specific Skills & Practices

Scholarly and Professional Skills & Attributes

90-100%

Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is excellent and informed by the highest level of scholarship.

Excellent integration of the full range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques goes beyond the material displaying exceptional flair in tackling issues identified.

Exceptional application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes.

Exceptional professional presentation using an appropriate range of resources and reflecting professional norms.

Work that influences how academics and students think about their discipline through: being original within the discipline; achieving the highest level of compelling, coherent and concise argument attainable within the level of study; using a full range of high-quality sources to inform but not dominate the argument.

80-89%

Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is comprehensive, accurate, relevant and informed by advanced scholarship.

Excellent integration of the full range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques goes beyond the material with excellent conceptualization which is original, innovative and/or insightful.

Excellent and original application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve the learning outcomes.

Excellent professional presentation using an appropriate range of resources and reflecting professional norms.

Work that has real potential to influence how academics and students may think about the discipline through: being original on the basis of its excellence in the context of the level of study; a compelling, coherent and concise argument; drawing on a full range of high-quality sources.

70-79%

Informed by a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is comprehensive, accurate, relevant with awareness of advanced scholarship

Very good integration of a full range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques goes beyond the material with very good conceptualization, which is often original, innovative and/or insightful.

Constantly applies theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes with some originality.

Very good professional presentation using an appropriate range of resources and reflecting professional norms.

Work that has some potential to influence how academics and students may think about the discipline through: some originality on the basis of its excellence in the context of the level of study; arguments which are coherent, concise, and frequently compelling; drawing on a wide range of high-quality sources.

60-69%

Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is comprehensive and accurate.

Good integration of a range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques

Some good insight into the material.

Clear evidence of the application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes with few obvious flaws.

Professional presentation using a good range of resources and reflecting professional norms.

Work that critically engages with current thinking in the discipline through: clear differentiation between the quality and appropriateness of the sources used; arguments which are coherent and concise and offer robust conclusions; the development of a good analytical model.

50-59%

Demonstrates an adequate breadth and depth of substantive knowledge but with only a few errors or omissions.

Demonstrates an adequate understanding of a range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques shows some ability to critically engage with the material.

Adequate application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes although with some obvious flaws.

Presentation which adequately reflects relevant professional norms.

Work that accurately reports on current thinking in the discipline through: the repetition of, rather critical engagement with, limited sources; adequate differentiation between the quality and appropriateness of sources used; drawing adequate conclusions which do not always fully reflect the complexity of the subject matter; an adequate if unsophisticated analytical model.

40-49%

Incomplete breadth and depth of substantive knowledge with some errors or omissions.

Demonstrates limited ability to put theory into practice.

Demonstrates an awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques.

Limited and underdeveloped critical engagement with the material

Work that offers a limited understanding of thinking in the discipline through: limited attention.

Demonstrates limited technical ability but lacking theoretical and reflective insights.

Presentation which reflects professional practice in a limited manner

30-39%

Little relevant knowledge which is minimal in its breadth and depth with major errors or omissions.

Minimal awareness of the appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques.

Fails to demonstrate sufficient critical engagement with the material.

Demonstrates a minimal ability to meet learning outcomes in the grasp of both theory and technical knowledge.

Presentation which displays little more than cursory attention to professional norms.

Work that often misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: minimal attention paid to the quality, range and appropriateness of sources used; poorly informed opinion led work with a minimal evidence base; no real underlying structure of argument; work that is frequently confused and incoherent.

20-29%

Does not demonstrate even a basic understanding of the subject matter.

Insufficient awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques.

Little evidence of critical engagement with the material

Lacks any real application of skills to meet learning outcomes.

Fails to demonstrate any substantive meeting of learning outcomes.

No real attention to the disciplinary norms of presentation.

Work that fundamentally misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: a lack of attention to the quality, range and appropriateness of sources used; poorly informed opinion-led work rather than evidence-based argument; no real underlying structure of argument

10-19%

Demonstrates confusion over the subject matter.

Little awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques.

No evidence of critical engagement with the material.

Fails to demonstrate the use of skills to meet learning outcomes.

Fails to demonstrate any substantive meeting of learning outcomes.

No real attention to the disciplinary norms of presentation.

Work that completely misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: inadequacy of sources used; unsubstantial assertion with no evidence base; failure to structure the argument being presented.

0-9%

Demonstrates mainly ignorance of the subject matter by presenting information of minimal relevance.

Little or no awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques

Learning outcomes are not met.

No real attention to any norms of presentation.

Work that completely misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: absence or misuse of sources; work that is confused and incoherent.

PRESENTATION
Your work should be word processed in accordance with the following:

  • Font size 12 Arial or Times New Roman
  • 1.15 line spacing.
  • Pages should be numbered
  • Your name should not appear anywhere on the script.

Feedback and return of work
You will receive detailed feedback on your submitted work via Turnitin and Grademark. You will receive a provisional mark for your work within 15 working days of submission. You will also have tutorial time to discuss your assessed work with the Module Leader, and an assessment clinic will be included in the timetable of the course.


The quoted price covers up to 3000 words. For custom requirements Live Chat or Whatsapp Click Here



                             

Email: [email protected]

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for د.إ50 Free

Formatting

for د.إ32 Free

Title page

for د.إ20 Free

Bibliography

for د.إ36 Free

Outline

for د.إ19 Free

Limitless Amendments

for د.إ38 Free

Get all these features for
د.إ195.00 FREE

ORDER NOW
assignment bank giveaways

Our Ratings